| Books I've Read This Year | |||
| Title | Author | Genre | Grade |
| Mr. Monk Is Cleaned Out | Lee Goldberg | Mystery | B |
| Lady Sings The Clues | Diane Vallere | Mystery | B- |
| Mysterious Benedict Society & The Prisoner's Dilemma | Trenton Lee Stewart | Young Adult | B |
| Girl Who Kicked The Hornets Nest | Steig Larssen | Thriller | B+ |
| Mr. Monk On The Road | Lee Goldberg | Mystery | B |
| Pride & Prejudice | Jane Austen | Drama | B+ |
| Food Rules | Michael Pollen | Non-Fiction | D |
| Outwitting Trolls | William G. Tapply | Mystery | B |
| Zombie Spaceship Wasteland | Patton Oswalt | Memoir | B |
| Burn Notice: The Reformed | Goldberg, Lee | Thriller | B |
| Designer Dirty Laundry | Diane Vallere | Mystery | B |
| Commencement | J. Courtney Sullivan | Drama | B |
| More 5 Minute Mysteries | Ken Weber | Mystery | B |
Sunday, January 1, 2012
Books I've Read This Year (2011)
I guess I haven't read too many books this year. I'll have to read more next year. (Or finish the things I'm halfways through.) First up this month is The Hunger Games, so I can finish it before the movie comes out.
Russell Brand And Katy Perry End Their 14-Month Marriage
I am shocked to hear this news. Completely shocked, I'm telling you and I'm not being sarcastic. 14 months ago when these two young kids got married, I was skeptical that it would last. He is a known womanizer and addict and she is a formerly Christian pop singer (albeit it a really hot one). I expected them to pull a Kardasahian a couple months later, but no- they kept on going. He must not have cheated on her or relapsed either or else he did and she forgave him and they kept on being married. There was no Sinead O'Connor/Britney Spears/Shannon Daherty/Lisa Marie Presley moment where the marriage was annulled shortly afterwards. That's why this annoucement took me by surprise.
Now, please don't misunderstand me. I'm not the least bit surprised they are getting a divorce since I've been expecting it every time she showed up on the news. There's Katy Perry- she's going to make an announcement.... oh, it's about being booted off Sesame Street. Here she is again- she's going to say that... oh, it's just to say she'll be on Saturday Night Live. What startled me was that it was Russell Brand that asked for a divorce. I was totally expecting her to get fed up with him cheating on her or doing drugs or something she couldn't forgive him for. I never thought that he was initiate things. Was she cramping his style or something? What gives?
British actor-comedian Russell Brand is divorcing “California Gurls” songstress Katy Perry after 14 months of what had appeared to be one of Hollywood’s happier marriages. “Sadly, Katy and I are ending our marriage,” Brand said in a statement to The Associated Press on Friday. “I’ll always adore her and I know we’ll remain friends.” Brand, 36, offered no other details, but in papers filed Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court, he cited irreconcilable differences.
Now, please don't misunderstand me. I'm not the least bit surprised they are getting a divorce since I've been expecting it every time she showed up on the news. There's Katy Perry- she's going to make an announcement.... oh, it's about being booted off Sesame Street. Here she is again- she's going to say that... oh, it's just to say she'll be on Saturday Night Live. What startled me was that it was Russell Brand that asked for a divorce. I was totally expecting her to get fed up with him cheating on her or doing drugs or something she couldn't forgive him for. I never thought that he was initiate things. Was she cramping his style or something? What gives?
Russell Brand And Katy Perry End
Their 14-Month Marriage
(By Associated Press, December 30, 2011)
British actor-comedian Russell Brand is divorcing “California Gurls” songstress Katy Perry after 14 months of what had appeared to be one of Hollywood’s happier marriages. “Sadly, Katy and I are ending our marriage,” Brand said in a statement to The Associated Press on Friday. “I’ll always adore her and I know we’ll remain friends.” Brand, 36, offered no other details, but in papers filed Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court, he cited irreconcilable differences.
He and the
27-year-old pop singer were married in October 2010 at a resort inside a tiger
reserve in India, and their mutual affection had become a rather sweet feature
of the celebrity circuit. The couple
announced their engagement in January 2010 after meeting at the 2009 MTV Video
Music Awards, where Brand hosted and she performed. The comedian, who once struggled with
substance abuse and sex addiction, was effusive about his bride while promoting
projects earlier this year, saying marrying Perry has “given me much more
strength in what I do.” “For a long
while, what I do professionally was all that mattered to me really,” he said in
March. “Now I think, well, whatever I do, I’ll just go back to her, and that’s
incredibly comforting.”
Perry
praised her husband backstage at the 2011 VMAs in August, where she won three
awards and he offered a tribute to Amy Winehouse. “I’m proud of him, whatever comes out of his
mouth, and sometimes it’s very colorful, right?” Perry said of Brand. “That’s
why I married him, because he’s smart and I learn a lot.” Attorneys for Perry, whose name is listed as
Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson in the divorce papers, did not respond Friday to
calls seeking comment.
The Internet
had been abuzz recently with rumors about possible trouble for the couple after
they were seen during the holidays without their wedding rings. Perry’s run of No. 1 singles earned her the
distinction of becoming MTV’s first artist of the year earlier this month. She
hosted “Saturday Night Live” on Dec. 10 and gave no indication any marital
woes. Brand’s recent film credits
include “Arthur,” ‘’Hop” and “Get Him to the Greek.” He is among the ensemble
starring alongside Tom Cruise in “Rock of Ages,” set for release next
year. Both Brand and Perry were absent
Friday from Twitter, where they often shared kind words for each other.
Monday, November 14, 2011
IRS & GOP Humor
From: Sue Aleksich
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 1:05 PM
Subject: Tax Return sent back
Subject: Tax Return sent back
The IRS sent my tax return back AGAIN
because of my response
to the question: "List all dependents:"
to the question: "List all dependents:"
I replied -
"12 million illegal
immigrants";
"3 million crack heads";
"42 million unemployable people on food stamps";
"2 million criminals in over 243 prisons";
"Half of Mexico"; and
"535 fools in the U.S. House and Senate.”
"3 million crack heads";
"42 million unemployable people on food stamps";
"2 million criminals in over 243 prisons";
"Half of Mexico"; and
"535 fools in the U.S. House and Senate.”
Apparently this was not an acceptable
answer.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
If It Is Delicious Bait, Is It Still A Bait And Switch?
I got tricked while trying to treat myself the day after Halloween. Normally on November 1st, I scour the nearby grocery stores and drug stores looking for Halloween candy that has been marked down by to 50% off. The stores are trying to clear stuff off the shelves so they can put out the Christmas displays, and I mean that literally. As I'm perusing the shelves, there is a a guy putting out the red and green stuff. There are always a few things left, like M&M's and Snickers fun size bars- things that taste exactly the same as the non-Halloween version but that happen to be packaged in a wrapper with now-passe pumpkin designs. So I stock up when I find these prefectly delicious treats (and some less delicious things like candy corn.)
What I didn't notice until halfways out the door of Safeway was that they put some regular priced items on the shelves with the discounted stuff. Since I made the stop on my way to work, I didn't feel like going back and disputing the price. It's not like a customer carelessly put something back in the wrong place- there were several dozen bags of the regular priced (yet autumnally packaged) Reese's Peanut Butter Cups. I considered that a fluke and proceeded along to CVS where I really scored- vanilla Tootsie rolls, Kit Kats, and Hershey mini bars. Six bags of things for $10. I don't need to buy any more candy until next spring (Well, unless I see some good things on sale the day after Christmas.)
That was a great deal so just to finish the rounds, I hit a Rite-Aid on the way home from work. I picked up some more M&M's, Twizzler's minis and some Autumn Mix (i.e. candy corn, but the brown tipped ones- which actually tastes better- plus there are the pumpkin ones in the bags too.) I also brought some more Kit Kat's to the counter along with the new Snicker's Squares but I didn't buy them. Can you guess why? No, not because of self-control around sweets. That's not likely. It was because they were full-priced! Again, the person who set up the discount rack put several rows of regular priced items in with the discount stuff. It was turning out to be a trend, not a fluke like I thought. I then had to wonder- did the person doing this forget to change the SKU in the computer or did they deliberately do it to increase sales from people who didn't notice the difference? For a second, I thought that maybe they were trying to keep the shelf looking full but then realized that they could have done that just using the sale candy since there was certainly enough of it, even if half of it was candy corn.
So in reality they were try to dupe me, to trick me. I found it vaguely ironic considering the holiday being celebrated but I still thought it was wrong to do that. Treats shouldn't come with strings attached, unless they are those chocolate foil wrapped Christmas tree ornaments. I wish I was the type to raise a fuss because I dislike having a bait-and-switch pulled on me, even if it is delicious bait.
What I didn't notice until halfways out the door of Safeway was that they put some regular priced items on the shelves with the discounted stuff. Since I made the stop on my way to work, I didn't feel like going back and disputing the price. It's not like a customer carelessly put something back in the wrong place- there were several dozen bags of the regular priced (yet autumnally packaged) Reese's Peanut Butter Cups. I considered that a fluke and proceeded along to CVS where I really scored- vanilla Tootsie rolls, Kit Kats, and Hershey mini bars. Six bags of things for $10. I don't need to buy any more candy until next spring (Well, unless I see some good things on sale the day after Christmas.)
That was a great deal so just to finish the rounds, I hit a Rite-Aid on the way home from work. I picked up some more M&M's, Twizzler's minis and some Autumn Mix (i.e. candy corn, but the brown tipped ones- which actually tastes better- plus there are the pumpkin ones in the bags too.) I also brought some more Kit Kat's to the counter along with the new Snicker's Squares but I didn't buy them. Can you guess why? No, not because of self-control around sweets. That's not likely. It was because they were full-priced! Again, the person who set up the discount rack put several rows of regular priced items in with the discount stuff. It was turning out to be a trend, not a fluke like I thought. I then had to wonder- did the person doing this forget to change the SKU in the computer or did they deliberately do it to increase sales from people who didn't notice the difference? For a second, I thought that maybe they were trying to keep the shelf looking full but then realized that they could have done that just using the sale candy since there was certainly enough of it, even if half of it was candy corn.
So in reality they were try to dupe me, to trick me. I found it vaguely ironic considering the holiday being celebrated but I still thought it was wrong to do that. Treats shouldn't come with strings attached, unless they are those chocolate foil wrapped Christmas tree ornaments. I wish I was the type to raise a fuss because I dislike having a bait-and-switch pulled on me, even if it is delicious bait.
Saturday, October 15, 2011
What I’m Checking Out This Month (August & September 2011):
Here are the various entertainment things I’m listening to,
watching or reading this month.
Books:
None: I didn’t
feed my brain this month. Or rather, I
didn’t finish any books this month- I’m in the middle of three of them.
Concerts:
Berlin (Opening for
INXS): I was kind of interested in seeing INXS, because I needed to up the
number of concerts I see this year after last year’s pitiful total of one
concert (Hole/Courtney Love). Then when
I heard the opening act would be Berlin, I got pretty excited. Terri Nunn, and whomever she brings in to be
the rest of Berlin (no original or even heyday members remain in the group),
always deliver a great set. Berlin
always seems to be the opening act, so that means I get to hear all the hits
and often just the hits. That’s nice
since I get to hear a lot of my favourites, but occasionally I would like to
hear some deeper cuts like Will I Ever Understand You, Like Flames or Blowing
Sky High or Stronger Than Steel. For
this show, it was just the hits, with a cover of Somebody To Love thrown in
along with one new song-in-progress called Break the Chains. Terri Nunn still sounds as great as always
although she wasn’t as energetic as in the past. (Is she pregnant? Getting older? Hungover?)
I don’t know why some big name artist hasn’t roped her into
working with them because she can really wail.
Fergie gets all the props these days for her “rock & roll voice” but
Nunn has been bringing it for two decades.
After Berlin, INXS put on a good show too- played all the hits, some
lesser cuts, a couple of revamped versions of hits, and just for good measure
played the revamped songs again in the normal versions as the encore. No wonder I couldn’t guess what they’d do for
the encore- they had already done a version of Don’t Change, their concert
finale staple, earlier. I was not as
taken with J.D. Fortune this time around- his singing was a little too
“bellowy” for me but it didn’t greatly hurt the show because the focus was on
the whole band, not just the singer. (As
exemplified by the opening where the three Farris brothers were alone on stage
playing drums.)
Movies:
I can’t believe that in the span of the last two months,
I’ve only seen three movies in the theatre.
I’ve watched some on DVD, like Soul
Surfer which I watched with my sister and brother-in-law while in
Colorado. I had avoided it in theatres
despite the fact it had a shark in it because it just looked too earnest and
uplifting for me. It’s that story of the
13-year old surfer girl in Hawaii who had her arm bitten off by a shark and instead
of giving up, she triumphantly returns to surfing and becomes a spiritual
icon. I also watched some things on
cable, when I randomly stopped on something while channel hopping (which
explains how I let myself get sucked into watching The Time Traveler’s Wife. It
was as hokey and maudlin as I imagined, despite featuring the delectable Rachel
McAdams.) I think it says more about the
quality of the movies that opened in August and September- and my lack of
sleep- than it does about my interest in seeing things because I do drag my
tired carcass to things I’m really interested in. For instance, I saw:
Crazy, Stupid Love: because
it got great reviews as a drama-edy but more importantly it has Marisa
Tomei! Steve Carell gets cheated on and
then dumped by his wife, Julianne Moore, so he has to start dating again even
though he is inept at it. (Sounds like
me, doesn’t it? Why does Steve Carell
always do roles that could be about me?)
Ryan Gosling is the local stud who teaches how to score chicks and
Marisa Tomei is the first conquest.
Since she is such a catch, in real life and in this movie, she doesn’t
take kindly to a “wham bam thank you ma’am” and eventually goes bonkers on him,
to hilarious effect. Lessons are learned
along the way by all the characters but it is still a pretty funny movie
despite learning stuff.
Midnight In Paris:
This is a Woody Allen movie. You will
probably have a reaction based just on that statement, which is fair but it also
means you haven’t been paying attention to his movies recently. First of all, Woody Allen doesn’t appear in
the movie, it isn’t set in New York (Care to guess where it does take place?)
and the subject matter could be anything (Match Point was a murder mystery,
Cassandra’s Dream was about two brother’s financial woes, Scoop was about journalism
and Vickie Christina Barcelona was about…threesomes?) This time it is a typical theme though. Owen Wilson plays a screenplay writer who is
stuck in a rut and unable to finish his first book. His wife, the ever lovely Rachel McAdams, is
his polar opposite wife. Whereas Wilson
loves the romantic notion of walking around Paris in the rain, his wife would
prefer to hop in the limo so she doesn’t get wet.
After a talking a walk to clear his head, he somehow ends up
in Paris in the Roaring Twenties and swap stories with Hemingway and
Fitzgerald. This happens to him every
night, except the time he tried to bring along the wife. This time traveling (delusion?), creates a
whole new set of opportunities, and problems.
I really enjoyed this movie. It
had some clever jokes and asked interesting questions. Plus it was fun to discuss afterwards. The person I saw it with said that it was
refreshing because her workday involves talking to people who have no knowledge
of things like literature, art, movies, theatre, music or television. (She works with nuns, yes, but apparently
they lack any interest in these things even though they aren’t forbidden from
engaging in them.) I’m not sure I could
handle talking to people and not being able to reference any of those
topics. This movie was one of Woody
Allen’s recent better movies and can be counted as a modest success
creatively. Financially though, it is one
of his most lucrative movies ever.
Definitely worth checking out.
Moneyball: I saw
this because it was written by Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network, Sports Night,
The West Wing). I enjoy his style and
baseball is usually a good subject for entertaining stories. Oddly enough though, this film was a bit flat. There weren’t enough baseball playing scenes
and the various characters’ interactions didn’t pop enough. The Social Network was more lively and
engaging even though its subject matter was much less compelling on the
surface. (Computer coding and venture
capital meetings versus baseball!
Shouldn’t even be a contest.) The
storyline revolves around the A’s trying to remain a contender the next season
after losing players like emerging superstars Johnny Damon and Jason
Giambi. Jonah Hill proposes a radical
new way to put together a team, using a system that flies in the face of
conventional baseball wisdom. Brad Pitt
did a good job as the harried general manager of the Oakland A’s and Jonah Hill
is surprisingly respectable in a mostly straight role. The performances are what carry the movie,
which is surprising considering the talent of the writer. Don’t get me wrong- it’s a good movie. It’s just not a great one and it should have
been.
Songs/Albums:
Melissa Auf Der Maur-
Out Of Our Minds: a female version of Joe Satriani. She writes songs to show off her guitar
playing skills, mixes in some mystical lyrics and has a theme for the
album. I’d gotten her first album and
enjoyed it and this one was more of the same.
I found two songs I really liked but the rest was ho-hum. I expected more from the former guitarist for
Hole.
Antonia Bennett- Love
Is A Battlefield (Single): Tony Bennett’s daughter covers a Holly Knight written
song (or- as you all know it- a Pat Benatar performed song.) It’s okay but I’m
really looking forward to the full length album that Holly Knight is producing
and writing for her. I need more Holly
Knight songs to exist. I’ve heard most
of the ones already out there.
Class Actress-
Journal Of Ardency: I read a review of this band that made them sound
pretty intriguing so I bought an EP of theirs.
It didn’t knock me out although one day they might start writing better,
catchier songs and get more exposure, like Cut Copy has done. Right now, Class Actress are doing mid-tempo,
contemplative dream-rock. It sounds sort of like the slower songs on a
Silversun Pickups album. I didn’t hate
it but there wasn’t anything that made me want to hit rewind.
Cage The Elephant-
Thank You Happy Birthday: If you
miss the Pixies, like I do, then get this album. Cage The Elephant captures the essence of the
Pixies sound and aesthetic quite well. Cage’s
songs are not quite as epic but since there is no more Pixies to be had, this
is a worthwhile substitute.
The Crash- Melodrama:
I heard a song from this band on someone’s iPod while I was playing poker at
their house and loved it. It may have
been the alcohol or the lack of sleep since it was 2 AM at the time but the
song “Gigolo” just hit me the right way.
It sounded a bit like Catatonia when they’ve had their caffeine. I ended up getting the album on a whim and
it turns out they are a Scandinavian band, which explains a lot about why they
sound like a heavier version of Roxette.
The song I’d heard was by far the best one on the so-so album so there
won’t be any need to look for any others.
Foster The People-
Torches: This is an indie pop band that I mentioned last year when
discussing how much their hit “Pumped Up Kicks” sounded like Peter, Bjorn And
John’s “Young Folks”. Little did I
realize that their album had several other less derivative but equally
enjoyable songs on it. In fact, my
favorite song of theirs is “Warrant”, because of its’ bright, shiny harmonies
and energetic thumping sound. This is a
cheerful, catchy collection of songs.
Perfect music for setting the mood for the day while driving into work.
Human League- Credo: It sounds like classic Human League,
minus the hit singles. Not worth the
import price. I was kind of disappointed
because they’ve done some decent post-heyday albums.
Keane- Night Train: Keane
is a frustrating band. I liked several
songs from their first album (Hopes And Fears), especially Everybody’s Changing
and Somewhere Only We Know. They were mid-tempo
songs in the vein of Coldplay, without being so whiny. The second album (Under The Iron Sea) blew me
away. It was clear, crisp, chiming
collection of songs that contained a wonderful mix of moods and tones, with
charming but sad lyrics. Listening to it
was like living inside Edge’s solo on U2’s In The Name Of Love. I repeatedly played over half the songs on
the CD and then had to wait forever, it seemed like, for their third album. The lead-off single from that (Spiraling) was
terrific, and seemed to continue the spirit of the album from two years ago. When I heard the whole thing though, it turns
out to be a radical departure from that.
It was more of a synth pop album but only a mediocre one at that. I hardly liked any of the songs and that was
very depressing considering how long I’d waited and the expectations that had
built up.
I got their fourth album (Night
Train) which came out two years later, although it seemed to arrive suddenly
since I wasn’t impatiently waiting for it.
Another album, another radical departure. This time they mixed up the moody rock vibe
of the second album with the jaunty pop leanings of the third with a touch of
Santana’s Supernatural concept of guest performers. I don’t really need a rap interlude on my
British mope rock. U2 ruined things for
a lot of bands. The other bands feel
like they also have to make radical sonic departures to stay legit as an
artist. This doesn’t work too well
unless you are as talented as U2 and few groups are. As a whole though, it was better than the
third album so now I am wondering how I will react to their fifth album.
John Legend & The
Roots- Wake Up!: John Legend and The
Roots team up to cover some classic, and some obscure, R&B songs. Most of them I didn’t know so I approached
this like a John Legend album. As such,
it is his third best one but it is worth a listen. It is smooth, enjoyable and has a good
message. The title track is the
centerpiece of the album and concept and not surprisingly, one of the most
successful tracks. This was worth the $5
I paid for the download.
Metric- Old World
Underground: Still waiting for
Metric to make a great album. Two good
songs don’t cut it. I don’t care how
attractive the lead singer is- I’m listening to her, not looking at her. To be fair, this is an earlier album and is
actually better than their latest and most successful album but they need to
really bring it on their upcoming one or I will write them off as a fluke who
had one great song. (“Black Sheep” on
the Scott Pilgrim soundtrack.)
The Muppets- The
Green Album: Very disappointed in
this Muppets cover album. The lineup of
bands wasn’t that strong and the songs weren’t done justice. How can a self-respecting band let a Muppets
band out-do them? The only one who
succeeds here is Weezer with Hayley Williams.
They take the spirit of the original song (“Rainbow Connection”) and
make it work to their strengths- edge, sincerity and harmony. Hmm- looking over this month, I’ve listened
to a lot of cover stuff and the ratio of success has not been on the positive
side. What’s going on? Have bands forgotten how to perform and just
think they can coast on irony or lackadaisical effort?
She & Him- Lotta
Love: I love this two-some, singer/songwriter Zooey DesChanel and
producer/multi-instrumentalist/everything else M. Ward. I love the Neal Young song “Lotta Love”, especially
the poignant, full of longing version done by Nicolette Larson back in the late
1970’s. So when I heard this band did a
cover of this song, I tracked it down (and boy was that hard because it’s not
commercial available for sale.) I’m not
particularly overwhelmed by this version though and I just figured out
why. There are not enough lyrics. I know that is shocking coming from me, a guy
who only sporadically pays attention to the words in a song, but there are only
two parts to the song and then lots and lots of repetition of the chorus. Larson’s voice was so plaintive and desperate
though that you could listen to the chorus over and over again while wishing
you could sooth her aching heart.
This version though is catchy enough and true to the
original Neil Young version (which also suffers by comparison) that you can’t
fault it, but if anyone else ever decides to cover the song, they only have two
options for doing it successfully- be one of the world’s best singers and
emulate Nicolette Larson’s take or write new lyrics so the focus is on the
words and the music and not just the vocals.
I would love to see Juliana Hatfield write a couple of new verses, strap
on her electric guitar, and sing the song sweetly and longingly, counterbalanced
by her fuzzed-out guitar work. Can I commission her to do this and do it the
way I want, or do artists have some silly rules about doing it “their
way”? Still, I recommend the song highly
but some incarnations are better than others.
Various Artists-
Pitchfork, Lollapalooza, Outside, Newermind, Parklife : Spin, CMJ and other
places sometimes offer free downloads and samplers so I get them when they are
offered. It’s a nice way to try
different bands or to get a song I like that I don’t feel like paying for. I dislike the fact that I have to burn this
stuff to disc if I want a permanent copy and that I have to copy the track
listing, but I get what I paid for it.
Usually I can find one or two gems amidst all the junk and that makes it
worth the effort. The Nirvana sampler
contains the worst cover of a Nirvana song I’ve ever heard (Come As You Are)
and that includes the Tori Amos cover of Smells Like Teen Spirit.
Sports:
Washington Redskins-
I saw an NFL football game, the Washington Redskins versus the Arizona
Cardinals. It was the second game of the
season following the opening day win so optimism was still in the air. I wanted to see the Redskins win but I didn’t
want the Cardinals to lose. Two people
sitting next to me were in the same boat.
A mom was there with her kid. She
was a redskins fan and the little kid was screaming “Go Larry!” every play
unless Beanie Wells got the ball, then he started screaming “Go Beanie!!!” Everyone around him, including his mom, was
looking at him like he was an alien. He
did not shut up until the last two minutes when Washington stripped Arizona of
the ball to take control of the game and preserve their slight lead.
TV Shows:
Take The Money And
Run: For this show, 2 people hide
$100,000 within 30 minutes before the police “arrest” them and then they try to
avoid telling the police where it is hidden.
If they can hold out for 48 hours of solitary confinement, broken up by
periodic questioning from the cops, they get to keep the money. If the cops find it or the prisoners confess
as to where it is, the cops keep it.
I’ve seen four episodes and I can’t understand why someone would crack
under the pressure of solitary. I would
get bored too but if that happened I’d use the down time to catch up on my
sleep, write (since I think you’re allowed to keep a journal), or string along
the cops so they keep pulling me in for questioning which would keep me
entertained. For 100 grand, I’d risk the
insanity of 48 hours of being by myself.
It’s like things are now, except without any books or TV. My only fear would be not finding a good
hiding place for the loot within 30 minutes. (And I also wonder if someone from
the show is keeping an eye on the money because some of the hiding places seem
like they would be stumbled upon by random strangers.
Platinum Hit
(Finale): I love this show about songwriting. I hear that ratings were a challenge and it
might not be back next season, which would be a shame. If I have to watch reality shows, since that
seems to be all that gets made these days, I’d at least like it to be one about
a topic I enjoy. This show gives
contestants- in groups usually- a song theme and a time frame of a few hours
and they need to create an original song and perform it in front of Jewel and
guest judges like Leona Lewis. My
favorite, Jes Hudick, made it to the finale.
For the final competition, she came up with a killer song and I thought
she might win even but no- she lost to someone else who I think won on the
strength of her voice and lyrics.
Basically, the opponent let the producer create the music and she added
lyrics and then performed it. This is a
song writing contest, not a lyrics or singing contest. If you don’t write the
song, you shouldn’t win the competition!
Fall TV Shows:
How I Met Your Mother, Glee, Castle, Raising Hope, Harry's
Law, The Middle, Modern Family, Survivor: South Pacific, Big Bang Theory,
Mentalist- These are all returning shows that I like and either watch in real
time or shortly thereafter as opposed to shows that I wait for until they hit a
rerun cycle during mid-season. All of
these shows remain interesting- no quality slumps, at least not in the first
few episodes.
Two And A Half Men-
Although I’m not an Ashton Kutcher fan, I don’t hate him either. (He was the least interesting character on
“That 70’s Show” and the only movies of his that I liked were The Butterfly
Effect, No Strings Attached and What Happens In Vegas.) I was impressed with the writer’s choices-
killing off Charlie Sheen, via Rose, and making Jon Cryer the love guru. Despite Cryer’s character’s romantic
ineptitude, he is now the experienced ladies’ man of the house who gives advice
to Kutcher. Then in the second episode,
toilet humor ruled and I had to re-evaluate my opinion. Once I did, I decided that it is the same old
show that I sometimes would watch. The
writer’s did a great job of changing the premise of the show, without changing
the show’s formula. Now that is a neat
trick.
Acerbic comedian Whitney Cummings has two shows on this
season. The first is 2 Broke Girls. It stars Kat Dennings, from Nick And Nora’s
Infinite Playlist and, um, Thor. She
plays a broke-ass waitress with trust issues and a knack for making cupcakes
and she befriends another waitress, who is also broke, but her poverty is
because her millionaire father ran a Ponzi scheme and went to jail, causing all
the family’s assets to be seized. The
two of them work together and live together, with their horse (I have no idea
why.) They are saving their money to
open a cupcake store (even though by the time they make enough money for it,
cupcakes will probably be a trend that has passed.) Whitney writes this, along with Michael
Patrick King (of Sex And The City,) as a typical sitcom albeit one with great
lines and terrific actresses. The whole
thing crackles with energy and the line deliveries zing.
Whitney’s other show is Whitney. She stars in this one herself and it has been
roundly savaged by critics and most of the people I know, although the ratings
are decent somehow and it got picked up for a second season. I like this show, despite the vitriol
surrounding it, because I think Whitney is deliberately choosing to make a show
that is a non-traditional comedy. Her
character is vain, defensive, petty, needy, sarcastic, cynical, bitchy and annoying
yet still, occasionally and surprisingly, caring and sympathetic. Her jokes are atypical and the premises veer
away from the expected. During a recent
episode when she suddenly realized her boyfriend was enjoying the silent
treatment she was giving him, you knew she was going to get him back somehow
but what she said first was “That little bitch!” You don’t expect an aggressive line like
that.
She then gave him the non-silent treatment by talking
continuously about every boring, random thought she had. I took this as a sarcastic comment on how
people complain about not communicating enough but when you listen to what they
actually say it is mind-numbingly trivial.
Plus on most shows, the girl is the eye candy and the guy gets all the
jokes. On Whitney, she is the instigator
and star and the guy is relegated to the “soothing, sensible, supportive
spouse” role. I equate this show to
other vehicles for cantankerous, grating characters like All In The Family and
The Honeymooners.
Playboy Club- I
twice tried to watch this show. The
first time was during the series premiere but I got bored, during the attempted
rape scene no less, and switched to something else. I later finished the first and second episode
and didn’t see any reason to keep watching.
I love Amber Heard, the lead character and also from the movie I Am
Number Four (as the kick-ass Number Six), but the show was slow, dull and
unoriginal and didn’t really do anything with its’ 1970’s Playboy Club
setting. How can you make that environment
boring? I don’t have to worry any longer
since the show has already been cancelled.
Although I often complain about shows I like being cancelled, at least
the shows I dislike or that I don’t think are any good usually get cancelled
too so it seems America gets it right half the time.
Biggest Loser- Jillian
Michels isn’t on it this season, the show focuses more on the competition
aspect than on diet/exercise tips and the weigh-in segment is interminably long
hence I won’t watch it this season.
New Girl- Zooey
DesChanel acts adorable and goofy, sometimes in a way relevant to her
character, sometimes just because it is fun to do so. No need to discuss the show’s premise because
I’m already hooked.
Unforgettable-
Poppy Montgomery, an attractive red-headed (really brunette or blonde?) cop,
has photographic memory. She solves
cases by recalling details from her memories the crime scenes and
interviews. It’s more engrossing than it
sounds. Plus did I mention she was
attractive?
Up All Night- Christina
Applegate is back. I’ve loved all her
previous shows (Samantha Who?, Jesse, Married With Children, Heart Of The City)
and on this one, she’s team with Will Arnett, and I’ve loved half his shows
(Running Wilde, but not Arrested Development.
Go figure.) After watching the
first two shows, I’m thinking that Applegate is now batting 80% and Arnett is
down to 33%. This show just feels too
predictable and the characters are too bland.
I see no reason to watch this compared to something else, like Community which is still the most
clever, anarchic, hilarious show on right now.
Community started off great and just keeps upping the ante somehow. Up All Night doesn’t have that feel. To be fair though, almost no other shows do
either. Maybe New Girl, 2 Broke Girls and Prime Suspect. That’s it.
Free Agents- I
would say something about this Hank Azaria show but I haven’t watched it yet,
which is good since it has been cancelled after two episodes.
The X Factor- Simon
Cowell returns with his spin on American Idol.
I was impressed that they landed Paula Abdul too. So far I’ve just been turning in between
commercials of other shows. Not a good
sign since reality show competition doesn’t usually do repeats so maybe I’ll
just say I’m not going to watch this.
Revenge- a
female, modern day version of The Count Of Monte Cristo, set in the Hamptons. It’s a prime time soap opera basically. I like it but I wish I felt more connection
with the lead actress. She’s not quite
pretty enough, doesn’t seem devious or manipulative enough either and doesn’t
appear to have backbone of steel I think is necessary for a revenge tale.
Prime Suspect- I
like strong willed, powerful woman, especially in my entertainment
choices. I’ll take Linda Hamilton in T:2
or Angelina Jolie in Salt any day.
That’s why I really like the show In Plain Sight. The lead character is a no-nonsense type who
speaks her mind and matches up toe-to-toe with her male counterparts. Even her recent pregnancy hasn’t softened
her. Now take that mindset and intensify
it. Make a grittier show and put a chip
on the woman’s shoulder. Make her
smarter and a better detective than the males and make them resent her for it. Now you have the show Prime Suspect. It’s a remake of the British TV series by
that name but since I haven’t seen that, I can’t say how true or loose it plays
compared to this US version. All I know
is that I like this show and I would love to have Maria Bello’s character on
any of my investigations. She set the
ground work for this character with her performances in History Of Violence and
especially Payback.
Charlie's Angels-
I watched the first two episodes and wondered how they could bungle things sooo
badly. It tries to tread the line
between camp humor, cop drama and action show.
The problem isn’t that it tries to be many different things (She Spies
successfully did that same thing for several enjoyable seasons), it’s that it
does all of them ineptly. The humor is
telegraphed, the action lacks in both intensity and believability and the
plotlines are standard. Their one good
punch was when they killed off a name star in the pilot to make way for Minka
Kelly’s character. If they were going to
go over the top, they should have done it like the second Charlie’s Angels movie
did.
Person Of Interest-
From the creators of Lost and featuring Michael Emerson, the squirrely guy from
Lost. In this show, he plays a squirrely
guy with a secret agenda and he manipulates the people around him to achieve
his objectives. Sound familiar? It is a bit like Lost in that there are
secrets lurking underneath everything that is going on but it is also has a lot
more action to it because the person being manipulated this time is Jim
Cazaviel (from Passion Of The Christ), a former CIA covert operative. He was recruited by Emerson to carry out
dangerous missions for him since Cazaviel is a bad-ass government agent and
Emerson is the squirrely nerd who created a massive computer program /
surveillance network and knows when crimes are being committed against innocent
people but he does not have the skills to stop them. What I like about the show is the
realism. When people get shot, they get
shot. It’s not an A-Team type show where
everyone dodges bullets and there is no sense of danger. I’m intrigued and want to find out where this
show is headed.
Secret Circle- Imagine
the witch clique from the movie The Craft.
Pretend the setting is where ever Gossip Girl is set. Throw in a dash of Heroes. That’s this show. I’ve only watched the premiere but I’ll watch
a bit more once mid-season repeats start on my other favorite shows. Same as I’ll do with The Ringer.
Pan Am- Aside
from Person Of Interest and Ringer, this is the most convoluted show of the
season and prior to seeing the first three episodes, I would have figured it to
be one of the least complex shows. It’s
about Pan Am airlines stewardesses.
You’d imagine it has some glamorous settings, some “workplace” romances,
and fun interactions with the passengers, kind of like an airborne Love Boat. You don’t expect the subplots of CIA agents,
runaway brides, class struggles, women’s lib issues, dark drama and a sexier
vibe than that of The Playboy Club. You
also absolutely do not expect it to feature Christina Ricci. Yeah, a legit
movie star is in this thing and that’s not even the main reason it is
good. It is all of these things
combined. I really like this show. Let’s hope it makes the cut.
Zoos/Aquariums:
Colorado Springs
Zoo: a pretty decent zoo. Many of the pens have more space that other
zoos and they had a diverse mix of animal.
I liked watching the hippo get fed a cabbage head and lettuce scraps and
the monkey house was interesting although I could do without seeing the penises
on that one variety of monkey. It was
also fun to watch Brendan pet the giraffe and the wallaby and ride the
carousel. He got a bit cranky toward the
end which was right about the time Mom and Dad got hungry so we wrapped it up
shortly after that, and dodged the rain again.
Tragedy Happens, Luckily
I saw Tragedy, who are the self-proclaimed # 1 Bee Gees
heavy metal tribute band in the world (or the New York tri-state area,
depending on where they are and how much they have been drinking.) They were at the State Theatre in Falls
Church (although they constantly referred to it as Falls Church City, and no
one calls it that. Where they goofing on
us or did someone tell them to say it that way?
Maybe as a goof on them?) For
$10, what did I have to lose? If it
sucked, I could always leave. The beer costs
$6 and Mike’s deep fried peanut butter and jelly sandwich costs $7 so the price
for the show is a bargain. I consider
this as the first tribute band concert I’ve seen because although I’ve seen
Abba: A Tribute, they were more of an Abba cover band. They did not perform in character or dress
like the band. Tragedy did. Boy did they.
There was more glitter in the air than at a Ke$ha concert. Their costumes were a perfect blend of 1970’s
Bee Gees inspired disco garb and 1980’s hair metal outfits. Rarely do sparkles and studded arm bracelets
go together but this night it worked.
The band found that precise balance between the campy humor
and cool, competent playing that I think is necessary for a tribute band to
work. I’m not sure why I would want to
see a straight forward tribute band- it would just make me long for the
original. A humorous take such as this
brings something new to the table. The
concept of the band- Bee Gees songs done in a heavy metal style- works so much
better than you would imagine. What
people forget about the Bee Gees is that they built their songs on guitars as
much as they did synthesizers. They had
some amazing guitar parts that translate really well to heavy metal, which is
all about guitar prowess, wailing vocals and heavy drumming. Does that sound familiar? The Bee Gees had a good guitar sound (all
three brothers played guitar for the band), wailing falsettos and disco is all
about the beat, just like with drumming.
One thing I didn’t realize until I heard it was how their
lyrics fit right into the metal framework.
Metal lyrics are all about chicks or sex or excess and the Bee Gees
lyrics are all about failed romance, love and sorrow. There isn’t much difference between choruses
like “Pour some sugar on me” and “Love you inside and out”. Both are metaphors for the same thing. Tragedy did a great job of making the
connections between the two genres.
Often times a song would start and you didn’t know if they were playing
a metal intro or a Bee Gees intro. One
song in particular, Mike and I looked at each other because it sounded like
they were doing Queen’s “We Are The Champions”, then it seamlessly segued into
Joan Jett’s “I Love Rock & Roll” before merging into an actual Bee Gees
song. It was astonishing and
entertaining. I spent a lot of the
evening trying to spot the musical reference- Ratt, Led Zeppelin, Scorpions, Kiss,
Joan Jett, Queen, Motley Crue. It turns
out I paid attention to, and enjoyed, 80’s hair metal more than I thought.
Some of the influences were obvious because the lead singer
would introduce the song in a way that let us know the style they were about to
appropriate. For instance, when they
branched out into one of their non-Bee Gees disco songs, he said “We’re going
to play some KC/DC and then they launched into KC & the Sunshine Band’s
“Get Down Tonight”. They also covered
Donna Summers “Hot Stuff”- lead singer Barry Glibb intro’ed it by saying “We
are going to rename the band for this next song. How often do you see a band break up right
before your eyes only to reform as a new band right before your eyes in a
totally spontaneous, completely unrehearsed way?” You Make Me Feel Like Dancing got the
treatment too (That’s a song by, as Glibb said, their protégé “Leo
Slayer”.)
The onstage banter and antics were part of the fun. Lance would come out in his white jumpsuit
and toss around glitter or to mop off the performers sweat, “Robin” played
cowbell and disco danced when not swiping drinks from the other band members, the
lead singer captured the unspoken superiority of Barry Gibb to the other Bee
Gees and Andy Gibb. At one point,
“Barry” asked the audience to vote on what the next song would be although
there was a caveat (“Maurice” asked “What’s a caveat?”) It had to be from one of these choices-
“Lemons Never Forget” from 1968’s “Horizontal” album or 1972’s “Paper Mache,
Cabbages & Kings” from the “To Whom It May Concern” album. I really wanted “Lemons” because I like the
song, even though most people have never heard it (or think it is stupidly
named, which it is.) Also, I don’t think
I’ve ever hear the other song or the album it is from. Still, the vote went for the second song
which they started playing (I think, not knowing the song) but stopped abruptly
to give us one more choice- Staying Alive.
Guess what won the vote?
The metal clichés were there too- there was an extended part
about oral sex on the flying V guitars, culminating in two V guitars
scissoring. The vocal wails on some of
the songs went almost over the top but stopped just short of parody which is
why they worked fantastically. The did
the standard metal guitar stuff- synchronized guitar bobbing, “chase and
follow” and “back to back” guitar playing and the lunk- headed, shirtless
drummer. “Barry” talked the bands
greatness- their album titles are “We Rock Sweet Balls And Can Do No Wrong” and
“Humbled By Our Greatness”, and how they play in front of huge crowds.
This night it wasn’t true (if it ever was.) There were about forty five people in the audience,
including the bar tenders. They had
their own cheering section in the corner though, who kept things lively even
when you could hear a pin drop (either deliberately, like on the dramatic pause
of How Deep Is Your Love or accidentally because the audience didn’t sing along
as expected). There was also a cute 25-year-old-ish
librarian-looking girl who was sitting there by herself. She wore a black t-shirt with white long
sleeves and a blue jacket. I couldn’t
see who was on the front of her shirt so I kept wondering which she was a fan
of- the Bee Gees, metal music or someone in the band. If it is the first one, I’m impressed, if
it’s the first two, I’m in love.
For the encore, they started by playing Bonnie Tyler’s
“Total Eclipse Of The Heart”, just because they think it’s a cool song. (“I’m not sure if we should play this
song. Part of the reason for not playing
it is because I don’t know the words.
Part of the reason for playing it is because it would sound
awesome. It’s not remotely related to
the Bee Gees but we will play, just because we want to. )” I knew they couldn’t finish with a n on-Bee
Gees song so I was trying to figure what the last song would be. As soon as they started playing it, I smacked
my head and said “D’oh!” Of course they
would play the song “Tragedy”! It’s the
name of the danged band!
It was a pretty thunderous version. Some of the songs this night almost verged on
thrash metal riffage and this was one of them, in parts. The band started jamming part of the way
through in order to allow “Barry” to invite all the girls in the audience to
come up front in dance, and for five of them to get onstage. Then he changed his mind since there were
only about 20 girls in the whole audience.
He told everyone to get onstage so there were then 30 people onstage
with the band and 12 people in the audience.
(The cute girl was the second one up there although they had to talk her
into it- weird, since she was up by the stage the whole night, taking videos
and bopping along to the music. Barry
said “Shy girls are welcome too!”) The
band got on the floor and played to the people on the stage, to give them a
taste of what it feels like. Then
something weird happened, something I’ve never seen at a concert. They gave the lead guitar to one of the
audience members to play (“Does anyone here onstage shred?”) and he did so
competently, although it wasn’t a Bee Gees song. That wasn’t the weird part though.
A few minutes later when the audience guitarist still hadn’t
finished playing, I noticed the only Tragedy band member on stage was the
drummer. All the other people were
gone. Nor did they ever return. The house lights went up and the sound was
cut off so everyone started to leave, all without a goodbye from the band. (I guess “Barry” constantly saying “You’re
welcome” during the expected applause parts should have been an indicator of
their willingness to be unconventional.)
I did see one band member again though.
Robin was in the lobby, along with Lance, selling t-shirts and CDs. They were only $10 so I decided to get a
shirt and the first CD.
Me- “I’ll take this CD and an XL shirt.” Robin- “Sorry, we only have 2XL.” Me- “Is the one on display the 2XL?” Robin- “Yes.”
Me- “That looks like it will work.
I’ll take that and this CD”. I
gave him the $20 which he tucked into his jumpsuit. Robin- “Here, I’ll give you the new CD
too.” Me- “Thanks! I enjoyed the show. You guys did a great job.” Then I turned and Mike and I left. As we go out the door “Robin says “Drive
safe!” so for $43, I saw a fun show, got
two beers, a t-shirt and two CDs. What a
bargain! Plus the CDs had several songs
that the band hadn’t even played so I get some new music too. Like “Shadow Dancing”, “Too Much Heaven”, “The
Woman In You”, Xanadu! I had a stupid
grin on my face the whole night and parts of it still remains. I’ll leave you with this bio from the band’s
website (the humorously named letsmaketragedyhappen.com) which gives you a
taste of the band’s sense of humor:
“Tragedy is the No. 1 Heavy Metal Tribute to the Bee Gees in
the Tri-State Area, eastern Pennsylvania, New England (excluding Rohde Island,
Maine and New Hampshire), Los Angeles City, Anaheim City, Tampa City, Texas
(excluding Ft. Worth City and Corpus Christie City), The Rocky Mountains, and
the United Kingdom (excluding Northern Ireland and the greater Leeds City
area). Audiences today are craving a
metal Bee Gees experience more than ever, and Tragedy has been delivering
quality Bee Gees metalization services since 2007.
A family business, Tragedy was formed by brothers Barry
Glibb, Mo'Royce Peterson, and Robin Gibbens. Rounding out the staff here at
Tragedy are little brother Andy Gibbous Waning on bass, and family patriarch,
The Lord Gibbeth, on drums.
Tragedy has played such amazing venues as New York City's
Bowery Ballroom (where they sold out their last concert), Irving Plaza, Nokia
Theatre, and Cha Cha's in Coney Island City. Across the pond they have
decimated 02 Academies throughout the UK including Shepherd's Bush Empire in
London City, as well as Kentishtown Forum, also in London City. They have
toured extensively in the UK, as support for Electric Six and The Wildhearts,
respectively, and as a headlining act.
They decimated Emo's Main Room at SXSW in 2008, have
conquered Houses of Blues throughout Texas and Anaheim City, and have ruled
cities up and down the East Coast. Their
first album, We Rock Sweet Balls and Can Do No Wrong, was highly received,
being played by Iron Maiden's Bruce Dickinson on his radio show, and most
recently between sets at the Alice in Chains concert!
Oh, and they also opened for Motorhead at the United
Kingdom's Guilfest in 2009, where they annihilated 10,000 unsuspecting now
Tragedy fans, whether they are aware of it or not.”
Monday, October 10, 2011
Subject: New Baby Schaub
From: Susan
Schaub, Date: October 9, 2011
So finally
here are the details... :-) My personal
cell wasn't letting me send outgoing messages for some reason so I had to wait
until I was home and got a few hours sleep - sorry for the delay.
Colin David
Schaub was born on Thursday, 10/6 at 5:46 pm. He was 8 lbs, 15 oz and 20.75 in
long. He has dark brown hair and blue
eyes. He likes to sleep during the day
and stay up all night so I am a little bit tired but doing well. Other than being backwards, he's a really
good baby thus far. Brendan is enjoying
having a little brother and is being my little helper. He was VERY excited when we came home from
the hospital to say the least.
I know there
isn't a picture yet attached but I promise to send one or two when I can.
Hope
everyone is doing well.
Susan
![]() |
| Colin, Susan, Brendan and Kevin Schaub |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
